Showing posts with label Amnesty. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Immigration Reform - No to Amnesty!

View the story "Immigration Reform" on Storify Immigration Reform http://theintransigentconservative.blogspot.com Storified by Brian Empric· Tue, Jan 29 2013 16:33:26 @Jordanfabian reports on the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” senators who agreed to an immigration reform framework that includes amnesty for illegal aliens.

“The principles agreed upon by this ‘Gang of Eight’ include enhancing border security and cracking down on businesses that employ undocumented immigrants. The outline also proposes making it easier for foreigners to come to the United States legally to work or join their families.”

“Senate staff from both parties characterized the document as a broad statement of principles rather than concrete legislative language, and one aide said that the group aims to have an actual piece of legislation ready as early as the end of March.”

“Under the 'Gang of Eight’ plan, undocumented immigrants would be required to register with the federal government. Those without a criminal record would be eligible for ‘probationary legal status’ if they pass a background check and pay fines and back taxes. The status would allow them to live and work legally in the U.S., but they would remain ineligible for federal benefits such as welfare or Medicaid.”

“At the same time, the government would spend more to prevent illegal border crossings in part by increasing the use of unmanned drones and hiring more border agents. It would also implement a new system to prevent people from overstaying their visas, a main source of illegal immigration. Those undocumented immigrants with criminal records would be subject to deportation.” Senators' Immigration Reform FrameworkA bipartisan group of senators has agreed to an immigration reform framework that includes a pathway to citizenship for the undocumented,... Gang of 8Brian_Empric Sen. John McCain on Monday with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer: “I’m not sure if it’s quote politics, but it’s certainly the realization that if we continue to polarize the Latino slash Hispanic vote that the demographics indicate that our chances for being in the majority are minimal. I’m sure that this is a factor because many of us believe that they are a natural constituency of ours; small business, less regulation, big service in the military, pro-life, all of those reasons. But this issue of illegal immigration has obviously been a major driving factor in the decision making of the Hispanic voter.”

Watch the segment via CNN and @NoahCRothman
John McCain: Without Backing Immigration Reform, 'Our Chances Of Being In The Majority Are Minimal' | MediaiteSen. John McCain (R-AZ) joined CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer on Monday to explain his support for a bipartisan effort to reform the immigration... @JakeSherman and @GingerGibson report that the White House praised the “Gang of Eight” plan, but with House Republicans, who usually oppose a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, “it landed with a thud.”

“Some House Republicans have come around to supporting ‘amnesty’ or a pathway to citizenship for the millions of illegal immigrants already in the country who could seek legal residency under the Senate plan. But there are still hardline conservatives who oppose it and will undoubtedly make the Senate plan a tough sell in the House. And the Senate plan could fall apart before it even gets there.”

“Immigration is a delicate political issue for Republicans. If the Senate passes a bill, the House will feel political pressure to take it up, lest they cement their image as Washington's obstructionists. But it isn’t likely to be a speedy process as Boehner (R-Ohio) has promised that legislation will move through regular order, meaning committee hearings and markups that could produce a completely different product.”
Immigration tough sell in GOP House - Jake Sherman and Ginger GibsonThe Senate’s bipartisan immigration reform plan was lauded by the White House and advocacy groups around town on Monday. But with H... The conservative Republicans in the House are right to be skeptical of any plan that provides amnesty, since history shows that this policy does not help Republicans politically, and is certainly no panacea that leads to future electoral victories. Amnesty is just another big government program that adds more poor people to the already massive welfare state.

In reality, open borders with lax security effectively import Democratic voters and maximize their advantage. Because of the Citizenship Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment, automatic birthright citizenship is granted to all people born in the United States, regardless of the alienage of the parents, which, like amnesty, serves as a magnet that attracts more illegal immigrants. In August 2010, the Pew Hispanic Center estimated that 340,000 babies in 2008 were the offspring of illegal immigrants, and 4 million U.S.-born children of illegal immigrant parents resided in this country in 2009.

In his October 21, 1984 debate with Walter Mondale, Ronald Reagan supported amnesty: “I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and who have lived here even though sometime back they may have entered illegally.”

In 1986, Reagan reluctantly signed the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, which legalized approximately three million illegal aliens. Simpson-Mazzoli required employers to verify the immigration status of employees, and criminalized knowingly hiring an illegal alien. However, the law did not stop calls for more amnesties and did not swell Hispanic support for Republicans.

Since Simpson-Mazzoli, the Republican presidential candidate has exceeded Reagan’s share of the Hispanic vote (37% in his re-election) in only 1 out of 7 elections. The Democratic advantage with this constituency is massive no matter who is running, or what their position is on amnesty and comprehensive immigration reform.

In George W. Bush’s 2004 State of the Union Address, he supported a temporary-worker program: “Tonight I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy. I propose a new temporary-worker program to match willing foreign workers with willing employers when no Americans can be found to fill the job. This reform will be good for our economy, because employers will find needed workers in an honest and orderly system. A temporary-worker program will help protect our homeland, allowing border patrol and law enforcement to focus on true threats to our national security. I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary-worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.”

In John McCain’s 2008 speech to NALEO, he likewise promoted a comprehensive change: “I and many other colleagues twice attempted to pass comprehensive immigration legislation to fix our broken borders; ensure respect for the laws of this country; recognize the important economic necessity of immigrant laborers; apprehend those who came here illegally to commit crimes; and deal practically and humanely with those who came here, as my distant ancestors did, to build a better, safer life for their families, without excusing the fact they came here illegally or granting them privileges before those who did.” Pew Hispanic CenterBrian_Empric So why don’t Hispanics vote for Republicans? Heather Mac Donald explains:

“The call for Republicans to discard their opposition to immigration amnesty will grow deafening in the wake of President Obama’s victory. Hispanics supported Obama by a margin of nearly 75 percent to 25 percent, and may have provided important margins in some swing states. If only Republicans relented on their Neanderthal views regarding the immigration rule of law, the message will run, they would release the inner Republican waiting to emerge in the Hispanic population.”

“It is not immigration policy that creates the strong bond between Hispanics and the Democratic party, but the core Democratic principles of a more generous safety net, strong government intervention in the economy, and progressive taxation… And a strong reason for that support for big government is that so many Hispanics use government programs.”

“The idea of the ‘social issues’ Hispanic voter is also a mirage. A majority of Hispanics now support gay marriage, a Pew Research Center poll from (October) found. The Hispanic out-of-wedlock birth rate is 53 percent, about twice that of whites.”

“A Fox News Latino poll in September 2012 found that 62 percent of likely Latino voters backed President Obama’s handling of health care, including the Affordable Care Act. Only 25 percent of those voters wanted the act repealed. The Catholic Church’s strong opposition to the bill’s contraception mandate did not tip the Latino scales against it, dealing another blow to the myth of the ‘social values’ Hispanic conservative.”

“Rather than solving the Republican party’s alleged Hispanic problem, the suddenly popular immigration amnesty could exacerbate it. Those who oppose amnesty do so on two grounds: a revulsion against violations of the rule of law and a fear that an amnesty will attract more illegal immigrants to the country, as previous amnesties in Europe and the U.S. have done. Those illegal immigrants who are drawn in by the hope of yet another future amnesty will be precisely that category of immigrant which now provides an ever-growing base for the Democratic party — low-skilled individuals who disproportionately consume government services and who lack the social capital to reliably inoculate their children against America’s underclass culture.” Why Hispanics Don't Vote for RepublicansHeather Mac Donald writes on NRO: The call for Republicans to discard their opposition to immigration amnesty will grow deafening in the ... Re: Why Hispanics Don't Vote for RepublicansHeather Mac Donald writes on NRO: To follow up on the question of whether Hispanics are held back from their natural Republican affinitie... Rachel Campos-Duffy, the Mexican-American wife of Wisconsin Republican Congressman Sean Duffy (and cast member on The Real World: San Francisco in 1994), agrees that a quick-fix amnesty solution will do more harm than good for Republicans:

“Yes, we have a serious problem with Hispanics… But the quick-fix immigration solutions now being offered by the likes of Charles Krauthammer and other establishment-elites figures are an over-correction, do not actually address the root of the problem, and, frankly, may even accelerate our losses in the crucial Hispanic demographic.”

“Hispanics rank immigration fourth in their list of concerns, behind the economy, education, and health care.”

“Hispanics come to America for the American Dream. They are ‘trabajadores,’ and you would be hard pressed to find an American farmer, contractor, or restaurant owner who would not testify to their work ethic. Unfortunately, the communities in which they live and work are teeming with liberal activists… All of these activist groups and institutions have a common ideology and an affinity for big and centralized government, and of course, entitlements. They go out of their way to sign folks up and to begin the cycle of government dependency.”

“The sad fact is that these activists operate unimpeded. The voices of economic freedom, personal responsibility, and self-determination are virtually nonexistent in Hispanic communities and media… Meanwhile, since Republicans and conservatives prefer D.C. think tanks and expensive ad buys to the long, hard, dowdy work of community organizing, we’ve effectively ceded these communities and the culture that surrounds them to the Left.”

“The irony of the now trendy quick-fix solutions of immigration and amnesty among GOP and conservative elites is that these short-term solutions may actually worsen our problem with Hispanics… without conservatives on the ground, educating and organizing on behalf of our values, we’ll just be helping the Left increase its numbers.” Read my column on NRO. Tell me if u agree with my strategy on attracting Hispanics 2 GOP?http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/333319/gop-s-hispanic-opportunity-rachel-campos-duffyRachel Campos-Duffy Victor Davis Hanson (@VDHanson) also writes that Republicans are right to worry about the Latino vote, but the wrong solution would be worse than none.

“Postelection panic among conservatives about the Latino vote has reached the point of absurdity — and mostly reveals the naïveté of detached political grandees who know little about the ideology and motivations of those they are now supposed to adroitly woo.”

“In the first place, why do Republicans think their conservative message is a natural one for the majority of contemporary Latinos/Hispanics — rubrics that strangely now include everyone from Cubans and upscale Argentinians to Oaxacan indigenous peoples and Hondurans? In truth, the vast majority of Latinos who vote overwhelmingly Democratic is made up of poorer immigrants from Central America and Mexico rather than Marco Rubio–like second-generation Cuban-Americans.”

“Second, the ‘grand bargain’ on comprehensive immigration reform envisions ending illegal immigration but granting amnesty to, at least, those who were brought here as children and are still under 25, in school or in the military, and without a criminal record. But why do Republicans think Latinos are in any significant way opposed to continuing illegal immigration?... An expectation of cyclical amnesty or a general unwillingness of Americans to enforce their own laws is a magnet for millions in Latin America.”

“For all practical purposes, ‘comprehensive reform’ means granting amnesty but also leaving the border fence uncompleted, having a guest-worker program, and issuing green cards to millions of illegal residents.”

“For all the talk of family values and natural conservatism, there is not much evidence that rates of illegitimacy, crime, or divorce are much lower among Latinos than among the general population, and plenty of reason to believe that they may in fact be higher than averages among whites and Asians. Issues like abortion, gay marriage, and environmentalism have been successfully welded by the Latino leadership into a liberal package — at best, the price that Latino elites pay to white liberal counterparts for their support of amnesty and generous entitlements; at worst, because they believe these issues are a thorn in the side of the status quo establishment.”

“What, then, should Republicans do? Stick to their melting-pot principles and apply them across the board, regardless of race and tribe, emphasizing the content of our characters rather than the color of our skins.”

“The success of the Obama campaign in capturing the minority vote was not due to a Republican failure to have minority voices (cf. the party’s multiracial convention), nor was it due to opposition to the DREAM Act, but rather to a moral failure on the part of Republicans (not even a mild rebuke to Joseph Lowery’s racist rant?) to demonstrate that those who were building racial divisions for political advantage were themselves the real racists.”
The Latino-Vote ObsessionVictor Davis Hanson writes on NRO: Postelection panic among conservatives about the Latino vote has reached the point of absurdity - and ... Mark Hugo Lopez (@mhugolopez) and Paul Taylor analyze the exit polls and Latino voters in the last election:

“Obama carried Florida’s Hispanic vote 60% to 39%, an improvement over his 57% to 42% showing in 2008. Also, Hispanics made up 17% of the Florida electorate this year, up from 14% in 2008.

“The state’s growing non-Cuban population—especially growth in the Puerto Rican population in central Florida—contributed to the president’s improved showing among Hispanic voters. This year, according to the Florida exit poll, 34% of Hispanic voters were Cuban while 57% were non-Cuban. Among Cuban voters, the vote was split—49% supported Obama while 47% supported Romney. Among the state’s non-Cuban voters, Obama won 66% versus 34% for Romney.”

“For Hispanic voters, according to the national exit poll, 60% identified the economy as the most important issue (of four listed) facing the country today, virtually the same as the share (59%) of the general electorate that identified the economy as the nation’s most important issue. On the other three issues asked about, for Hispanic voters, the economy was followed by health care (18%), the federal budget deficit (11%) and foreign policy (6%).

“Throughout this election cycle, the issue of immigration has been an important issue for Hispanics. In the national exit poll, voters were asked about what should happen to unauthorized immigrants working in the U.S. According to the national exit poll, 77% of Hispanic voters said these immigrants should be offered a chance to apply for legal status while 18% said these immigrants should be deported.”

“According to the national exit poll, Hispanic women supported Obama more than Hispanic males—76% versus 65%.”

“Among Latino voters whose total family income is below $50,000, 82% voted for Obama while 17% voted for Romney. Among Latino voters with family incomes of $50,000 or more, 59% voted for Obama while 39% voted for Romney.”

See also: http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/2012/11/2012_Latino_vote_exit_poll_analysis_final_11-09.pdf
Obama won 71% of #Hispanic vote, the highest since Bill Clinton won 72% in 1996 http://pewrsr.ch/UwZC6l http://pic.twitter.com/mfS9jFaLPew Hispanic Center

Monday, January 28, 2013

Monday's Menagerie

@ericallie

Michael Ramirez

Jeff Darcy

View the story "Monday's Menagerie (1/28/13)" on Storify Monday's Menagerie (1/28/13) http://theintransigentconservative.blogspot.com Storified by Brian Empric· Mon, Jan 28 2013 18:54:08 Illegal immigrants are competing with less-educated American citizens for jobs. 50.6% of working-age adult American citizens (18 to 65) not holding a job have no education beyond high school. This is 27.7 million potential less-skilled workers, while seven to eight million illegal immigrants are thought to be holding a job, the overwhelming majority of which have no more than a high school education. Steven A. Camarota, Director of Research at the Center for Immigration Studies, concludes:

“It is difficult to overstate the size of the pool of potential workers that now exists in the United States. If through enforcement a large fraction of illegal immigrants returned to their home countries rather than being allowed to stay with legal status, there would seem to be an ample supply of idle workers to replace them, particularly workers who have relatively little education. Of course, employers might have to pay more, and offer better benefits and working conditions in order to attract American citizens. But improving the living standards and bargaining power of the least-educated and poorest American workers can be seen as a desirable social outcome. The contention that there is a general labor shortage that has to be satisfied by giving work authorization and/or citizenship to illegal immigrants and increasing the number of immigrants allowed into the country seems entirely inconsistent with the available evidence.”

“While it would be a mistake to think that every job taken by an illegal immigrant is a job lost by a native, it would also be a mistake to imagine that allowing illegal immigrants to stay permanently in their jobs has no impact on labor market outcomes for U.S.-born workers.”
Amnesty and the U.S. Labor MarketThe president and his political allies seem to believe that the kinds of jobs done by such workers are plentiful. However, the findings o... Melanie Trottman (@wsjMelanie), Jess Bravin (@JessBravin) and Michael R. Crittenden report that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled last week that President Obama violated the Constitution in filling three National Labor Relations Board vacancies, and therefore those recess appointments are invalid.

“The decision strips the board of key powers and could void some of its actions over the past year.

“The board made more than 200 case rulings last year, including a decision that protected workers from being fired for complaining about working conditions on sites like Facebook, and a decision that gave greater rights to unions in employee-discipline cases.

“The ruling also puts in jeopardy recent moves by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, since its director, Richard Cordray, also was installed in a recess appointment.”

“The court case turned on whether the Senate was in recess when Mr. Obama made the appointments during a holiday break early last year. The Constitution allows a president to unilaterally install nominees to positions that normally require Senate confirmation when the Senate is in recess.”

“The Justice Department didn't immediately announce its next move, but an appeal to the Supreme Court is likely.”
Court Rules Obama Recess Appointments Unconstitutional - http://WSJ.com http://on.wsj.com/W7rSAK via @WSJMichael Crittenden “There was a time when you had to be successful on Wall Street to become secretary of the Treasury. Now along comes presidential nominee Jack Lew, whose only business credential is a stint at the most troubled too-big-to-fail bank.”

“There probably weren't many laughs at Citi during the market panic in 2008. But if someone had said that a (Citigroup’s now defunct Alternative Investments unit) executive would be the secretary of the Treasury within five years, the line would have brought the house down.”

“Defenders of Mr. Lew say that by the time he showed up at CAI most of the bad decisions had already been made. But even if Mr. Lew didn't create the mess, the taxpayers who ended up underwriting his seven-figure compensation might want to know what exactly he was doing to clean it up.”

“If confirmed, Mr. Lew will chair the Financial Stability Oversight Council, responsible for identifying and addressing ‘systemic risks’ to the financial system. It's hard to believe he can competently perform this task if his only experience in a similar situation ended in failure.”

“Before he took the top operating job at the CAI division, he held the same job at Citi's Global Wealth Management division, beginning in July 2006… while Mr. Lew's future colleagues at the CAI division were cooking up toxic investments, some of his Global Wealth Management colleagues were feeding them to investors.”

“The greatest irony is that given Mr. Lew's crisis-era resumé, he bears a remarkable resemblance to the bankers who President Obama says created the financial crisis and deserve federal investigation. But apparently there's an exception as long as your liberal intentions are noble and you're a loyal Democrat. Then you can get rich at one of Wall Street's biggest failures and end up running the entire financial system.”
Treasury Gets a CitibankerThere was a time when you had to be successful on Wall Street to become secretary of the Treasury. Now along comes presidential nominee J... James C. Capretta (senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute) and Jeffrey H. Anderson (senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute) write that the Obamacare fight has just begun and the only question is how to proceed, unless we are willing to give in to an eventual single-payer, universal, socialized health care system.

“Only 18 states plus the District of Columbia are planning to take on the full responsibility for the administration of Obamacare… Steadfast resistance by so many states is a welcome and important development. In addition to the signal that such resistance sends, Congress hasn’t authorized funding for the federally run Obamacare exchanges that would operate in place of state-based ones.”

“In addition to opting out of establishing the exchanges, states can also refuse to implement Obamacare’s massive expansion of Medicaid. The Supreme Court opened up this option by striking down the law’s onerous penalties on states that decline to raise the income cutoff for Medicaid eligibility by 33 percent, as Obamacare prescribes.”

“Beyond these encouraging developments in the states, however, there are two proposals that Republicans should embrace in the early months of 2013 to help destabilize Obamacare and lay the foundation for its eventual replacement. First, congressional Republicans should push for a delay in Obamacare’s implementation. Second, the party should unite behind, and persuasively advance, a credible and practical replacement plan—for one cannot replace Obamacare without offering a replacement.”

“Once a possible delay gets floated by Republicans in Congress, it could gather momentum. Many governors, including some Democrats, are likely to support such a move because they see a train wreck coming in 2014 and are eager to avoid it.”

“…the most important thing for the GOP at this point is to develop and unite behind a practical replacement proposal—one that will actually solve the very real problems plaguing American health care… Americans want reform of some sort to address the issues of preexisting conditions, rapidly rising costs, and unstable and insecure insurance for tens of millions of their fellow citizens.”

“Since World War II, the federal tax code has been heavily biased toward job-based insurance. As a result, those without access to employer plans have a very difficult time finding affordable insurance. In reforming the insurance market, Republicans should end the tax code’s discrimination against those outside of the employer-based system.”

“The primary problem in American health care is that it operates without the discipline of a properly functioning marketplace. The federal government’s subsidies in Medicare and Medicaid, and its tax subsidies to employer plans, are open-ended and increase when costs rise. This undercuts the incentive for price-shopping and for judicious use of resources.”

“If Republicans were to advance a replacement along these lines—a plan that would provide stable insurance options, consumer choice, and high-quality health care without the heavy-handed mandates and regulations of Obamacare—the American people would be more than happy to throw Obamacare overboard.”

“In direct contradiction to what President Obama repeatedly promised, Americans will soon realize two things: Obamacare will cause health costs to rise, not fall; and just because they like their health plans, that doesn’t mean they’ll get to keep them… Since Obamacare will mandate that businesses with at least 50 workers provide insurance to all ‘full-time’ employees—defined under the overhaul as those who work at least 30 hours a week—the 49-employee business and the 29-hour week will both become commonplace.”
Delay, Repeal, ReplaceWatching Congress take the final steps to pass Obamacare in March 2010 was a bitterly disappointing moment for the law's opponents. They ... Diversity of State Coverage OptionsBrian_Empric Micah Cohen blogs that “an Electoral College based on Congressional districts would be decidedly more friendly to Republican presidential candidates than the current system” and changes would pose danger for Democrats.

“With Virginia, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin awarding their electors proportionally by Congressional district, Mr. Obama would have won re-election by just 30 electoral college votes instead of 126… If those five states and Florida had switched to a proportional system, Mr. Romney would currently be getting accustomed to the West Wing computers.”

“The states where Democrats could gain a significant number of votes from proportional allocation by Congressional district — Texas, Georgia, North Carolina and Arizona — are all controlled by Republicans. In addition, even if the system were somehow put in place in every state, the payoff for Democrats would be substantially smaller than the G.O.P.’s electoral windfall.”
The proposed changes to electoral college may be unlikely to all pass, but GOP is proposing them where it would matter http://nyti.ms/YtBid0Micah Cohen